logo
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • License Agreement
    • Charges and Financing
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
  • en
    • Українська

Prospecting and Development of Oil and Gas Fields

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

Integrated approaches to corrosion risk management in industrial pipelines

Andrii Hrytsanchuk, Valentyn Hrytsanchuk, Halyna Riabko, Oleksandra Semysiuk, Andrii Stanetskyi
Abstract

Corrosive processes in technical systems are crucial for their longevity and reliability. The stability of engineering structures and the efficiency of technical systems depend on successful corrosion management. In this regard, manufacturers and researchers are actively working on the development of mathematical models for the prediction and control of corrosion processes. Mathematical models have become a key tool for accurately predicting corrosion activity and assessing associated risks. This opens up opportunities for the rational use of resources and preventing accidents, which can significantly enhance the durability of technical constructions. The primary goal of scientific research is to develop effective models that consider the key factors influencing corrosion. Incorporating these factors into mathematical models enables a comprehensive approach to the problem that adapts to various conditions and characteristics of technical systems. The emphasis on mathematical models is determined by their ability to provide accurate forecasts of corrosion activity and to control and prevent negative consequences for technical systems. Research focuses on identifying key factors, developing high-precision models, and considering various conditions and features of technical systems. The overall objective is to create effective tools for predicting corrosion activity and preventing negative impacts on technical systems. This not only contributes to the development of advanced technologies in industry and engineering but also improves safety standards and the longevity of technical constructions. Among the important aspects related to corrosion processes in technical systems, it is crucial to consider their ecological consequences. Corrosive damage can lead to the release of harmful substances into the environment, resulting in soil and water pollution. Specifically, the corrosion of metal structures can contribute to the release of toxic metals, negatively impacting biodiversity and ecosystems. The application of mathematical models for predicting and controlling corrosion activity not only contributes to resource conservation and increased durability of technical systems but also plays a crucial role in reducing environmental impact. Minimizing corrosion processes helps maintain ecological stability and makes a significant contribution to preserving natural resources and biodiversity

Download article

Received 20.03.2023

Revised 18.07.2023

Accepted 28.08.2023

https://doi.org/10.69628/pdogf/3.2023.07
Retrieved from Vol. 23, No. 3, 2023
Pages 7-14

Suggested citation

Hrytsanchuk, A., Hrytsanchuk, V., Riabko, H., Semysiuk, O., & Stanetskyi, A. (2023). Integrated approaches to corrosion risk management in industrial pipelines. Prospecting and Development of Oil and Gas Fields, 23(3), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.69628/pdogf/3.2023.07

References

  1. Ameh, E.S., Ikpeseni, S.C., & Lawal, L.S. (2017). A review of field corrosion control and monitoring techniques of the upstream oil and gas pipelines. Nigerian Journal of Technological Development, 14(2), 67-73. doi: 10.4314/njtd.v14i2.5.
  2. Montemor, M.F. (2014). Functional and smart coatings for corrosion protection: A review of recent advances. Surface and Coatings Technology, 258, 17-37. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.06.031.
  3. Emami, M.R.S. (2011). Mathematical modelling of corrosion phenomenon in pipelines. The Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 3(2), 202-211. doi: 10.22436/jmcs.03.02.12.
  4. Singh, R. (2017). Pipeline integrity: Management and risk evaluation (2nd ed.). Waltham, MA: Gulf Professional Publishing.
  5. Ji, M., Yang, M., & Soghrati, S. (2023). A deep learning model to predict the failure response of steel pipes under pitting corrosion. Computational Mechanics, 71(2), 295-310. doi: 10.1007/s00466-022-02238-y.
  6. Wasim, M., Shoaib, S., Mubarak, N.M., Inamuddin, & Asiri, A.M. (2018). Factors influencing corrosion of metal pipes in soils. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 16(3), 861-879. doi: 10.1007/s10311-018-0731-x.
  7. Verma, C., Ebenso, E.E., Quraishi, M.A., & Hussain, C.M. (2021). Recent developments in sustainable corrosion inhibitors: Design, performance and industrial scale applications. Materials Advances, 2(12), 3806-3850. doi: 10.1039/D0MA00681E.
  8. Raj, B., Jayakumar, T., & Rao, B.P.C. (1995). Non-destructive testing and evaluation for structural integrity. Sādhanā, 20(1), article number 538. doi: 10.1007/BF02747282.
  9. Khan, F., Yarveisy, R., & Abbassi, R. (2021). Risk-based pipeline integrity management: A road map for the resilient pipelines. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, 1(1), 74-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpse.2021.02.001.
  10. Gurrappa, I., Yashwanth, I.V.S., & Mounika, I. (2015). Cathodic protection technology for protection of naval structures against corrosion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences, 85(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1007/s40010-014-0182-0.
  11. Nesic, S., Postlethwaite, J., & Olsen, S. (1996). An electrochemical model for prediction of corrosion of mild steel in aqueous carbon dioxide solutions. Corrosion, 52(4), 280-294. doi: 10.5006/1.3293640.
  12. Fontana, M.G., & Greene, N.D. (1967). Corrosion Engineering. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
  13. Jones, D.A. (1996). Principles and prevention of corrosion (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
  14. Revie, R.W., & Uhlig, H.H. (2008). Corrosion and corrosion control: An introduction to corrosion science and engineering (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9780470277270.
  15. Koch, G. H.,Brongers, M.P.H., & Thompson, N.G. (2002). Corrosion costs and preventive strategies in the United States (Report No. FHWA-RD-01-156). Federal Highway Administration.
  16. Pots, B.F., John, R.C., Rippon, I.J., Thomas, M.J.J., Kapusta, S.D., Girgis, M.M., & Whitham, T. (2002). Improvements on de Waard-Milliams corrosion prediction and applications to corrosion management. In Proceedings of NACE CORROSION 2002 (Article number 02235). Colorado: NACE International. doi: 10.5006/C2002-02235.
  17. de Waard, C., Lotz, U., & Milliams, D.E. (1991). Predictive model for CO₂ corrosion engineering in wet natural gas pipelines. Corrosion, 47(12), 976-985. doi: 10.5006/1.3585212.
  18. Schmitt, G., Plagemann, P., Möller, K., & Bosch, C. (2002). Local wall shear stress gradients in the slug flow regime: Effects of hydrocarbon and corrosion inhibitor. In Proceedings of NACE CORROSION 2002 (Article number NACE-02244). Colorado: NACE International. doi: 10.5006/C2002-02244.
  19. Schmitt, G., Bosch, C., Möller, K., & Mueller, M. (2000). A probabilistic model for flow-induced localized corrosion. In Proceedings of NACE CORROSION 2000 (article number 00049). Florida: NACE International.
  20. Poberezhnyi, L., Hrytsanchuk, A., Hrytsuliak, G., Poberezhna, L., & Kosmii, M. (2018). Influence of hydrate formation and wall shear stress on the corrosion rate of industrial pipeline materials. Koroze a ochrana materiálu (KOM – Corrosion and Material Protection Journal), 62(4), 121-128. doi: 10.2478/kom-2018-0017.
  21. Mohyaldin, M.E., Elkhatib, N., & Ismail, M.C. (2011). Coupling NORSOK CO₂ corrosion prediction model with pipelines thermal/hydraulic models to simulate CO₂ corrosion along pipelines. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 6(6), 709-719.
  22. Poberezhnyi, L.Y., Hrytsanchuk, A.V., & Petrushchak, S.M. (2017). A simplified mathematical model of the influence of gas hydrates on internal pipeline corrosion. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 27(6), 150-153. doi: 10.15421/40270630.
  23. Mazur, M., Poberezhnyi, L., & Poberezhna, L. (2014). Mathematical modelling of internal pipe corrosion under the influence of gas hydrates. Bulletin of Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National Technical University, 76(4), 88-102.

Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas 76019, 15 Karpatska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

  • nung@pdogf.com.ua