logo
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • License Agreement
    • Charges and Financing
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
  • en
    • Українська

Prospecting and Development of Oil and Gas Fields

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

Investigation of the influence of the geometric shape and material of pigs on the efficiency of pipeline cleaning

Serhii Stetsiuk, Yaroslav Doroshenko, Robert Bondarenko, Oleksandr Filipchuk, Yuliia Doroshenko
Abstract

To increase the hydraulic efficiency of pipelines and reduce the rate of intra-pipe corrosion, it is necessary to regularly clean their internal cavity from various contaminants. This especially applies to gathering pipeline systems, heat and gas networks, pollution of which leads to a decrease in gas production volumes and a significant increase in energy costs for transportation. Traditional methods of cleaning such pipeline systems do not always make it possible to increase the hydraulic efficiency of pipelines, besides, they are accompanied by production and technological losses of gas. This can be prevented by using cleaning pigs, however, due to a number of complications for such pipelines, it is necessary to develop and select pigs with increased throughput and study the influence of their material and geometric shape on the efficiency of pipeline cleaning. Therefore, the purpose of the work is to study the dynamics of the movement of cleaning pigs of different geometric shapes made of various hyperelastic materials through horizontal and lowered section of pipelines and their cleaning processes. For such studies, technologies for manufacturing test samples of cleaning pigs of different geometric shapes from various hyperelastic materials have been developed. In order to study the dynamics of the movement of each test sample, determine its throughput and evaluate the effectiveness of its cleaning of pipelines, an experimental installation with glass pipes and elbows was developed and assembled, which contains long horizontal and lowered section. The through-conduit of each test sample of the cleaning pig and the effectiveness of its cleaning of the pipeline were determined experimentally. Based on the results of research, the geometric shape of test samples of cleaning pigs was adjusted to increase their through-conduit. A plan for progressive verification of the pig for cleaning the gahering pipeline systems, heat and gas networks has also been developed, which makes it possible to choose the most effective pig

Download article

Received 26.06.2023

Revised 21.11.2023

Accepted 30.12.2023

https://doi.org/10.69628/pdogf/4.2023.26
Retrieved from Vol. 23, No. 4, 2023
Pages 26-43

Suggested citation

Stetsiuk, S., Doroshenko, Ya., Bondarenko, R., Filipchuk, O., & Doroshenko, Yu. (2023). Investigation of the influence of the geometric shape and material of pigs on the efficiency of pipeline cleaning. Prospecting and Development of Oil and Gas Fields, 23(4), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.69628/pdogf/4.2023.26

References

  1.  Borregales, M., Ensalzado, R., & Asuaje, M. (2014). CFD analysis of phenomena attributed to pigging run in a straight pipeline. In Proceedings of the ASME 2014 international mechanical engineering congress & exposition IMECE 2014 (pp. 1-9). Montreal: ASME. doi: 10.1115/IMECE2014-37452.
  2. Cao, Y., Zhen, Y., Shi, Y., Zhang, S., Sun, Y., & Nie, W. (2018). Stress distribution of the power section cup of pipeline inspection gauges by finite element method. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 9(2), 1-11. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000308.
  3. Chen, Z., Qiu, X., & Yang, L. (2022). Deformation and stress analysis of cup on pipeline inspection gauge based on reverse measurement. Energy Science & Engineering, 10(7), article number 25092526. doi: 10.1002/ese3.1241.
  4. Den Heijer, A. (2016). Frictional behaviour of pigs in motion. (Master’s thesis, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg, Netherlands).
  5. Doroshenko, Y.V., Karpash, O.M., & Gozhaev, B.N. (2019). Research on the composition of pipeline gas-liquid flows and the impact of harmful impurities in them on pumping modes and energy consumption for transportation. Exploration and Development of Oil and Gas Fields, 4(73), 35-45. doi: 10.31471/1993-9973-2019-4(73)-35-45.
  6. Grudz, Ya.V., & Melnytska, L.I. (2016). Unstationary processes in a gas pipeline during the movement of mechanical devices. Prospecting and Development of Oil and Gas Fields, 1(58), 69-81.
  7. Grudz, Ya.V., & Slobodian, N.B. (2020). Increasing the efficiency of cleaning gas pipes by adjusting the movement speed of cleaning devices. Oil and Gas Power Engineering, 1(33), article number 2935. doi: 10.31471/1993-9868-2020-1(33)-29-35.
  8. Kim, S., Jeong, J., Yoo, K., Yoo, H., & Seo, Y. (2022). Experimental investigation on speed excursion of PIG due to friction variation in natural gas pipeline. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 104, article number 104659. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104659.
  9. Kim, S., Jongyeon, J., Yoo, K., Yoo, H., & Seo, Y. (2022). Experimental investigation on speed excursion of PIG due to friction variation in natural. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 104(1), article number 104659. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104659.
  10. Kondrat, R.M., Uhrynovskyi, A.V., Petryshak, V.S., & Sapozhkova, T.S. (2013). Characteristics and selection of cleaning devices for cleaning the internal cavity of pipelines. Prospecting and Development of Oil and Gas Fields, 3(48), 48-61.
  11. Lesani, M., Rafeeyan, M., & Sohankar, A. (2012). Dynamic analysis of small pig through two and three-dimensional liquid pipeline. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 5(2), 7583. doi: 10.36884/jafm.5.02.12170.
  12. Liang, Z., Jiawei, Z., & He, H. (2020). Modeling and simulation of pigging for a gas pipeline using a bypass pig. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1-12. doi: 10.1155/2020/2047352.
  13. Lie, R., & Craig, S. (2009). Operational pigging programs and stuck pig recovery from gas export pipeline. In Materials of the PPSA seminar (pp. 1-9). Aberdeen: Pigging Products & Services Association.
  14. Matta, L. (2008). Pipe explosion during pigging procedure. Pipeline and Gas Journal, 235(10), 84-86.
  15. Molyneux, D. (2017). Dewatering unpiggable gas gathering line with elastomeric pig. In Materials of the PPSA seminar (pp. 1-4). Aberdeen: Pigging Products & Services Association.
  16. Nieckele, A., Braga, M., & Azevedo, L. (2000). Transient pig motion through non-isothermal gas and liquid pipelines. In 3rd International pipeline conference (pp. 611-618). Calgary, Alberta: ASME. doi: 10.1115/IPC2000-175.
  17. O’Donoghue, A. (2002). Why pigs get stuck, and how to avoid it. In Pipeline pigging, integrity assessment, and repair conference (pp. 1-16). Amsterdam: Pipeline Research Limited.
  18. Solghar, A., & Davoudian, M. (2012). Analysis of transient PIG motion in natural gas pipeline. Mechanics & Industry,13, 293-300. doi: 10.1051/meca/2012039.
  19. Stetsiuk, S. (2022). Experimental studies of the effectiveness of cleaning the internal cavity of pipelines with pistons made of hyperelastic materials. Oil and Gas Power Engineering. 2(38), 62-75. doi: 10.31471/1993-9868-2022-2(38)-62-75.
  20. Volovetskyi, V.B., Doroshenko, Ya.V., Bugai, A.O., Kogut, G.M., Raiter, P.M., Femiak, Y.M., & Bondarenko, R.V. (2022). Developing measures to eliminate of hydrate formation in underground gas storages. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 111(2), 64-77. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.9996.
  21. Volovetskyi, V.B., Doroshenko, Ya.V., Kogut, G.M., Dzhus, A.P., Rybitskyi, I.V., Doroshenko, J.I., & Shchyrba, O.M. (2021). Investigation of gas gathering pipelines operation efficiency and selection of improvement methods. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 107(2), 59-74. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.3585.
  22. Wang, W., Huang, Q., Liu, Y., & Sepehrnoori, K. (2015). Experimental study on mechanisms of wax removal during pipeline pigging. In SPE annual technical conference and exhibition held in Houston (pp. 1-25). Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/174827-MS.
  23. Ward, P., & Cockfield, D. (2018). Development of the pathfinder foam caliper pig. In Materials of the PPSA seminar (pp. 1-10). Aberdeen: Pigging Products & Services Association.
  24. Winters, B. (2011). Cleaning pig designs and applications. In Nace central area conference (pp. 1-24). Houston, Texas: Williams.
  25. Zhou, J., Deng, T., Peng, J., Liang, G., Zhou, X., & Gong, J. (2019). Experimental study on pressure pulses in longdistance gas pipeline during the pigging process. Science Progress, 103(1), 1-23. doi: 10.1177/0036850419884452.
  26. Zhu, X., Fu, C., Wang, Y., & Zhang, S. (2023). Experimental research on the contact force of the bi-directional pig in oil and gas pipeline. Petroleum Science, 20(1), 474-481. doi: 10.1007/s11249-017-0830-z.

Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas 76019, 15 Karpatska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

  • nung@pdogf.com.ua